Hey everyone, thanks again for all of the feedback. I've updated CEP-53
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-53%3A+Cassandra+Rolling+Restarts+via+Sidecar>
to discuss how rolling restarts and future cluster-wide operations can be
integrated into the existing operational job framework. For the most part,
you can find these updates in the OperationalJob Framework
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-53%3A+Cassandra+Rolling+Restarts+via+Sidecar#CEP53:CassandraRollingRestartsviaSidecar-OperationalJobFramework>,
API
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-53%3A+Cassandra+Rolling+Restarts+via+Sidecar#CEP53:CassandraRollingRestartsviaSidecar-API>,
and New or Changed Public Interfaces
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-53%3A+Cassandra+Rolling+Restarts+via+Sidecar#CEP53:CassandraRollingRestartsviaSidecar-NeworChangedPublicInterfaces>
sections. I also addressed any outstanding comments or questions that were
raised in this discussion thread.

I'll give folks a few days to look over the CEP again in case there are any
other questions, and hope to start the voting process next week.

On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 3:56 PM Andrés Beck-Ruiz <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> We would like to propose CEP 53: Cassandra Rolling Restarts via Sidecar (
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-53%3A+Cassandra+Rolling+Restarts+via+Sidecar
> )
>
> This CEP builds off of CEP-1
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-1%3A+Apache+Cassandra+Management+Process%28es%29+-+Deprecated>
> and proposes a design for safe, efficient, and operator friendly rolling
> restarts on Cassandra clusters, as well as an extensible approach for
> persisting future cluster-wide operations in Cassandra Sidecar. We hope to
> leverage this infrastructure in the future to implement upgrade automation.
>
> We welcome all feedback and discussion. Thank you in advance for your time
> and consideration of this proposal!
>
> Best,
> Andrés and Paulo
>

Reply via email to