Hello everyone, Stefan, Jindal,
I hope I've addressed your concerns in the discussion thread. Let's discuss if anything remains unclear. https://lists.apache.org/thread/pow83q92m666nqtwyw4m3b18nnkgj2y8 Let's keep the voting thread tidy. On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 at 17:03, Jindal, Himanshu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Maxim, > Thanks for putting this together — and apologies for not raising my > concern earlier in the discussion thread and causing some avoidable churn. > The CEP itself is very helpful. I appreciate that it outlines how we plan > to keep the new CQL commands, nodetool, and nodetool probe functionality > aligned with this change. > I do have a clarification: how will the new CQL API behave if the user > does not specify a hostname? My understanding is that commands like nodetool > bootstrap typically run on a single node. Will we continue requiring > users to specify a hostname/port explicitly, or will the CQL API be > responsible for orchestrating the command safely across the entire cluster > or datacenter? > I also share Stefan’s concern, though I don’t believe the feedback is > against adding new syntax — we certainly want Cassandra to continue > evolving and to make operations easier for users. This CEP moves in that > direction. It might, however, be worth verifying that the proposed CQL > syntax aligns with PostgreSQL conventions, and adjusting it if needed for > cross-compatibility. > Thanks again, > Himanshu > > > *From: *Štefan Miklošovič <[email protected]> > *Date: *Monday, October 6, 2025 at 6:28 AM > *To: *[email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject: *RE: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] CEP-38: CQL Management API > > *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know > the content is safe. > > Hi Maxim, > > Is your proposal truly going to introduce new CQL syntax? > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-38%3A+CQL+Management+API#CEP38:CQLManagementAPI-CQLCommandSyntax > > There was quite a heated argument in an adjacent thread about adding > custom syntax so I just want to highlight the fact that your CEP is > introducing that as well. I just want to be on the same page with everybody > so we are aware that your CEP will indeed introduce new CQL syntax, as it > might be considered as something which drifts away from "pure SQL" and > introduces custom concepts tailored only for Cassandra. > > I do not personally find this problematic and I do not object what you are > trying to do. I just want to make it explicit for everybody that there are > various instances of this happening and we should treat these cases equal. > > Anyway, > > +1 > > Regards > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 2:11 AM Paulo Motta <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 - Nice proposal! > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 7:45 PM Abe Ratnofsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > On Oct 2, 2025, at 4:56 PM, Joseph Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 10:59 AM Jaydeep Chovatia < > [email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 8:25 AM Doug Rohrer <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 - Thanks for the CEP and discussion... looking forward to this moving > forward. > > Doug > > On Oct 2, 2025, at 9:53 AM, Bernardo Botella <[email protected]> > wrote: > > +1 (nb) > > On Oct 1, 2025, at 4:55 PM, Josh McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2025, at 7:36 PM, Francisco Guerrero wrote: > > +1 > > On 2025/10/01 17:58:53 Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > > Dear Community, > > > > I would like to start voting on CEP-38. > > > > Proposal: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-38%3A+CQL+Management+API > > > > Discussion thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/pow83q92m666nqtwyw4m3b18nnkgj2y8 > > > > > > See voting guidelines > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > > > +1 - to accept (CEP-38: CQL Management API) > > 0 - don't care either way > > -1 - DO NOT accept (explain why) > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 168 hours (7 days) till October 8, > > 2025, 6 p.m. UTC. > > Please, write me down the thread if you need additional time to check > > the proposal or have any questions. > > > > -- > > Maxim Muzafarov > > > > > > >
