I am +1 on this CEP. Very happy to see where we ended up with it. I did want to call out one minor contradiction I assume is just an editing oversight. I’m supportive of either way we end up here so regardless my +1 holds. Wanted to call it out so we can clarify. The CEP says both of the following:
> The design for this initial iteration emphasizes simplicity, supporting a single global dictionary (per table) and manual dictionary training. At the same time, it maintains extensibility for future use cases like automated training This to me implies it will be built extensibly so automation can be added later but is not in scope of this CEP. > Automated dictionary training is also in scope and will be supported. The automation includes the continuous sampling, training decision and the evaluation to decide whether the new dictionary is wanted. This to me clearly states automation is in scope for this CEP. Jordan On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 11:19 Jindal, Himanshu <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > *From: *Jon Haddad <[email protected]> > *Date: *Wednesday, September 10, 2025 at 11:00 AM > *To: *[email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject: *RE: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] CEP-54: ZSTD with Dictionary SSTable > Compression > > *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know > the content is safe. > > +1 > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:53 AM Yifan Cai <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Everyone! > > I would like to start voting for CEP-54. > > Proposal: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-54%3A+ZSTD+with+Dictionary+SSTable+Compression > Discussion: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/cx1c1xtzy9dcxo9d3o3q92sxq9014trf > > The vote will be open for 72 hours. A vote passes if there are at least 3 > binding +1s and no binding vetoes. > > Thanks, > Yifan Cai > >
