+1
> On 18 Jun 2025, at 14:24, Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> We're at 10 binding +1. Need 3 more to move this across the line.
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025, at 6:58 PM, Joseph Lynch wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 1:47 PM David Capwell <dcapw...@apple.com
>> <mailto:dcapw...@apple.com>> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>>> On Jun 17, 2025, at 3:44 AM, Štefan Miklošovič <smikloso...@apache.org
>>> <mailto:smikloso...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 1:58 PM Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org
>>> <mailto:jmcken...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [DISCUSS] thread:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/vr7j2ob92k6fbcwvlfo60l3scylzdbft
>>>
>>> Text to vote on:
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [New LTS JDK Adoption]
>>> When a new JDK goes LTS, we prioritize:
>>> Moving trunk to build, run, pass CI, and support language level of that
>>> JDK, dropping others
>>> Adding support to run on that JDK to all supported GA releases, passing all
>>> CI using that JDK
>>> These 2 operations must merge atomically. This allows us to preserve the
>>> contract of allowing like-to-like JDK's for a live C* upgrade
>>> [Build, run, language level, Pre Commit CI, EOL]
>>> trunk builds, runs, has CI on, and supports the language level of 1 JDK at
>>> any given time (ideally latest LTS JDK)
>>> Supported non-trunk GA branches:
>>> build, run, pass CI, and support the language level of the oldest JDK they
>>> are certified for
>>> Are supported to run on all LTS JDK's between their oldest supported and
>>> newest LTS supported by trunk
>>> In the very rare case a feature would have to be removed due to JDK change
>>> (think UDF's scripting engine), we instead keep the maximum allowable JDK
>>> for that feature supported on trunk and subsequent releases. The feature is
>>> flagged for deprecate-then-remove or re-implementation based on dev ML
>>> discussion. If removed, we drop the required older JDK across all branches
>>> when the feature is removed. Supporting new LTS JDK's is considered higher
>>> priority than supporting features that JDK's are no longer compatible with,
>>> pending debate on the dev ML.
>>> Dropping JDK support happens naturally as old releases go EOL.
>>> [Post Commit JDK validation CI]
>>> Periodically we will run all CI pipelines for all runtime supported JDK's
>>> for that branch (cadence TBD)
>>> We will add basic perf testing across all GA branches + their supported
>>> runtime JDK's with reference workloads from easy-cass-stress for a simple
>>> performance-based smoke test
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Vote structure:
>>> Roll call
>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Cassandra+Project+Governance>
>>> is 25.
>>> Quorum: 13 (min required votes to qualify results)
>>> Super-majority of participating votes in favor required to pass (9 in favor
>>> at 13 min votes, etc)
>>> Will leave the vote open for a week.
>>>
>
