> If removed, we drop the required older JDK across all branches when the 
> feature is removed. 
Talking to Doug about this; let's revise this phrasing to:
"When the feature has been removed from all supported branches, the constraint 
to retain JDK support for that feature drops with it."

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025, at 7:58 AM, Josh McKenzie wrote:
> +1
> 
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025, at 7:56 AM, Josh McKenzie wrote:
>> [DISCUSS] thread: 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/vr7j2ob92k6fbcwvlfo60l3scylzdbft
>> 
>> Text to vote on:
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *[New LTS JDK Adoption]*
>>  • When a new JDK goes LTS, we prioritize:
>>    • Moving trunk to build, run, pass CI, and support language level of that 
>> JDK, dropping others
>>    • Adding support to *run* on that JDK to all supported GA releases, 
>> passing all CI using that JDK
>>  • These 2 operations must merge atomically. This allows us to preserve the 
>> contract of allowing like-to-like JDK's for a live C* upgrade
>> *[Build, run, language level, Pre Commit CI, EOL]*
>>  • trunk builds, runs, has CI on, and supports the language level of 1 JDK 
>> at any given time (ideally latest LTS JDK)
>>  • Supported non-trunk GA branches:
>>    • build, run, pass CI, and support the language level of *the oldest JDK 
>> they are certified for*
>>    • Are supported to *run* on all LTS JDK's between their oldest supported 
>> and newest LTS supported by trunk
>>  • In the very rare case a feature would have to be removed due to JDK 
>> change (think UDF's scripting engine), we instead keep the maximum allowable 
>> JDK for that feature supported on trunk and subsequent releases. The feature 
>> is flagged for deprecate-then-remove or re-implementation based on dev ML 
>> discussion. If removed, we drop the required older JDK across all branches 
>> when the feature is removed. Supporting new LTS JDK's is considered higher 
>> priority than supporting features that JDK's are no longer compatible with, 
>> pending debate on the dev ML.
>>  • Dropping JDK support happens naturally as old releases go EOL.
>> *[Post Commit JDK validation CI]*
>>  • Periodically we will run all CI pipelines for all *runtime* supported 
>> JDK's for that branch (cadence TBD)
>>  • We will add basic perf testing across all GA branches + their supported 
>> runtime JDK's with reference workloads from easy-cass-stress for a simple 
>> performance-based smoke test
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Vote structure:
>>  • Roll call 
>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Cassandra+Project+Governance>
>>  is 25.
>>  • Quorum: 13 (min required votes to qualify results)
>>  • Super-majority of participating votes in favor required to pass (9 in 
>> favor at 13 min votes, etc)
>> Will leave the vote open for a week.
>> 
> 

Reply via email to