I think it may be better to use LOOSE_NOT_NULL instead of NOT_NULL. The reason is: NOT_NULL can easily make users think that it is a related function of MYSQL, but in fact we are different. Changing a different name may avoid users' preconceived feelings.
Dinesh Joshi <djo...@apache.org> 于2025年2月11日周二 01:55写道： > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 9:05 AM Bernardo Botella < > conta...@bernardobotella.com> wrote: > >> We have consensus then. Let’s ditch the non strict version, and rename >> the STRICTLY_NOT_NULL to NOT_NULL. >> > > Can you give this thread at least 24-48 hours to ensure we capture any > other perspectives? >
