I think we can close the vote by now. The voting passes with 6 +1s (2 nb)
and no -1.

On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 8:06 PM Ekaterina Dimitrova <e.dimitr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 at 13:52, Benjamin Lerer <ble...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Le ven. 8 nov. 2024 à 18:31, Yifan Cai <yc25c...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> +1 (nb)
>>>
>>> - Yifan
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 10:31 PM guo Maxwell <cclive1...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Stefan and Dinesh. Let's wait a little longer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dinesh Joshi <djo...@apache.org> 于2024年11月7日周四 23:56写道:
>>>>
>>>>> Maxwell, here's the documentation for project governance for reference
>>>>> -
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Cassandra+Project+Governance
>>>>>
>>>>> Like Stefan said, please wait until more binding +1s come in.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm +1 on the CEP.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dinesh
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 7:51 AM Štefan Miklošovič <
>>>>> smikloso...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Maxwell,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> any CEP in general requires more binding votes than 1 from myself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I advise you to wait a little bit longer until at least three binding
>>>>>> votes accumulate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:42 PM guo Maxwell <cclive1...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you everyone. If there is no other feedback, I feel that this
>>>>>>> vote has passed and CEP-43 is adopted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bernardo Botella <conta...@bernardobotella.com> 于2024年11月6日周三
>>>>>>> 23:40写道:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (nb)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Guo for addressing all the comments!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Nov 6, 2024, at 7:21 AM, Štefan Miklošovič <
>>>>>>>> smikloso...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Having all cleared out in discussion thread (1), I think we can
>>>>>>>> finally vote on this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I welcome everybody to finish this vote or raise other issues in
>>>>>>>> the discussion thread if any.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (1)
>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/2z09twbrv75rszpxbm1przxxohpjvkkl
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 2:53 AM guo Maxwell <cclive1...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now at this point I think we can continue  the voting for CEP-43
>>>>>>>>> as all the feedback in the discussion thread seems to be addressed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Proposal: CEP43-CREATE TABLE LIKE
>>>>>>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-43++Apache+Cassandra+CREATE+TABLE++LIKE>
>>>>>>>>> Discussion thread:  discussion
>>>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@cassandra.apache.org:lte=1M:create%20table%20like>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As per the CEP process documentation, this vote will be open for
>>>>>>>>> 72 hours (longer if needed).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bernardo Botella <conta...@bernardobotella.com> 于2024年10月16日周三
>>>>>>>>> 07:40写道:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fair point. I will move my feedback there.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 15, 2024, at 4:19 PM, Yifan Cai <yc25c...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For further discussions, should we use the discussion thread?
>>>>>>>>>> This thread is for voting.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Yifan
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 3:31 PM Bernardo Botella <
>>>>>>>>>> conta...@bernardobotella.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guo,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it would make sense to add a fourth keyword to add
>>>>>>>>>>> after the WITH for Constraints? (See CEP-42)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Copying a table without the defined constraints may be useful.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Bernardo
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 9, 2024, at 9:32 PM, guo Maxwell <cclive1...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ok, I think the time can be two weeks .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Abe Ratnofsky <a...@aber.io> 于2024年10月10日周四 11:51写道:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> With the CEP only being completed last week and the Community
>>>>>>>>>>>> over Code conference finishing up this week, I'd love to have a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> few more
>>>>>>>>>>>> days to review and discuss the proposal.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to