The patches for this issue have gotten a +1 from Mick, and that meets our
strict 2 committer rule, but I'm posting them here in case anyone else
wants take a look:

4.0: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/3526
4.1: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/3539
5.0: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/3544

On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 10:21 AM Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for declaring things like this in the vote/release emails.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Brandon
>
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 10:17 AM Michael Shuler <mich...@pbandjelly.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > I've stated this same opinion prior, fix was in NEWS.txt and users had a
> > bad day with a behavior change. Perhaps this kind of inclusion needs
> > more exposure. This is exactly the sort of change may *also* be best
> > stated clearly in the vote/release emails, ala:
> >
> > <release bits>
> > ==================================================
> > This release contains a relatively major change you should be aware of,
> > with xyz fix, new default, and with the behavior change, here are the
> > new defaults, how to disable, etc...
> > ==================================================
> > kthxbai.
> >
> > Just do everything possible to convey what operators need to know,
> > wherever we can, if we include the fix. Link to NEWS.txt is insufficient
> > in this sort of case.
> >
> > Warm regards,
> > Michael
> >
> > On 9/12/24 13:16, Abe Ratnofsky wrote:
> > > Expressing another vote in favor of rejection-by-default. If a user
> doesn't want to lose sleep for data loss while on-call, they can read
> NEWS.txt and disable rejection.
> > >
>

Reply via email to