Hi, I am +1 on CEP-42 with the latest updates to the CEP to clarify syntax, error messages, constraint naming and generated naming, alter/drop, describe etc.
I think this now tracks very closely to how other SQL databases define constraints and the syntax is easily extensible to multi-column and multi-table constraints. Ariel On Mon, Jul 1, 2024, at 9:48 AM, Bernardo Botella wrote: > With all the feedback that came in the discussion thread after the call for > votes, I’d like to extend the period another 72 hours starting today. > > As before, a vote passes if there are at least 3 binding +1s and no binding > vetoes. > > Thanks, > Bernardo Botella > >> On Jun 24, 2024, at 7:17 AM, Bernardo Botella <conta...@bernardobotella.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I would like to start the voting for CEP-42. >> >> Proposal: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-42%3A+Constraints+Framework >> Discussion: https://lists.apache.org/thread/xc2phmxgsc7t3y9b23079vbflrhyyywj >> >> The vote will be open for 72 hours. A vote passes if there are at least 3 >> binding +1s and no binding vetoes. >> >> Thanks, >> Bernardo Botella
