So then cutting an alpha2 is possible. Kind Regards, Brandon
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 2:59 PM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > You can't change bits in a signed and checksummed artefact. You have to cut > from scratch. > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 20:28, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I think the last time I looked into it there was nothing in the >> scripts that forced anything, but if that's not true I think we should >> be fixing that, not having it drive our release decisions. >> >> Kind Regards, >> Brandon >> >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:54 PM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 19:27, J. D. Jordan <jeremiah.jor...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> That said. This is clearly better than and with many fixes from the >> >> alpha. Would people be more comfortable if this cut was released as >> >> another alpha and we do beta1 once the known fixes land? >> > >> > >> > >> > There is no way with our release process to do this. The QA label is part >> > of our version number and that's baked in. >> > >> > Otherwise I entirely agree that alpha2 would have been the better label >> > here. We are working in an unusual situation, one I hope we don't repeat. >> >
