1 Yes 4
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 3:00 AM Benedict <bened...@apache.org> wrote: > 3: CREATE <HNSW|LSM|SAI> INDEX (Otherwise 2) > No > If configurable, should be a distributed configuration. This is very > different to other local configurations, as the 2i selected has semantic > implications, not just performance (and the perf implications are also much > greater) > > On 15 May 2023, at 10:45, Mike Adamson <madam...@datastax.com> wrote: > > > >> [POLL] Centralize existing syntax or create new syntax? >> >> 1.) CREATE INDEX ... USING .... WITH OPTIONS... >> 2.) CREATE LOCAL INDEX ... USING ... WITH OPTIONS... (same as 1, but >> adds LOCAL keyword for clarity and separation from future GLOBAL indexes) >> > > 1.) CREATE INDEX ... USING .... WITH OPTIONS... > > [POLL] Should there be a default? (YES/NO) >> > > Yes > > [POLL] What do do with the default? >> >> 1.) Allow a default, and switch it to SAI (no configurables) >> 2.) Allow a default, and stay w/ the legacy 2i (no configurables) >> 3.) YAML config to override default index (legacy 2i remains the default) >> 4.) YAML config/guardrail to require index type selection (not required >> by default) >> > > 3.) YAML config to override default index (legacy 2i remains the default) > > > > On Mon, 15 May 2023 at 08:54, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> >> [POLL] Centralize existing syntax or create new syntax? >>> >>> 1.) CREATE INDEX ... USING .... WITH OPTIONS... >>> 2.) CREATE LOCAL INDEX ... USING ... WITH OPTIONS... (same as 1, but >>> adds LOCAL keyword for clarity and separation from future GLOBAL indexes) >>> >> >> >> (1) CREATE INDEX … >> >> >> >>> [POLL] Should there be a default? (YES/NO) >>> >> >> >> Yes (but see below). >> >> >> >>> [POLL] What do do with the default? >>> >>> 1.) Allow a default, and switch it to SAI (no configurables) >>> 2.) Allow a default, and stay w/ the legacy 2i (no configurables) >>> 3.) YAML config to override default index (legacy 2i remains the default) >>> 4.) YAML config/guardrail to require index type selection (not required >>> by default) >>> >> >> >> (4) YAML config. Commented out default of 2i. >> >> I agree that the default cannot change in 5.0, but our existing default >> of 2i can be commented out. >> >> For the user this gives them the same feedback, and puts the same >> requirement to edit one line of yaml, as when we disabled MVs and SASI in >> 4.0 >> No one has complained about either of these, which is a clear signal folk >> understood how to get their existing DDLs to work from 3.x to 4.x >> > > > -- > [image: DataStax Logo Square] <https://www.datastax.com/> *Mike Adamson* > Engineering > > +1 650 389 6000 <16503896000> | datastax.com <https://www.datastax.com/> > Find DataStax Online: [image: LinkedIn Logo] > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_company_datastax&d=DwMFaQ&c=adz96Xi0w1RHqtPMowiL2g&r=IFj3MdIKYLLXIUhYdUGB0cTzTlxyCb7_VUmICBaYilU&m=uHzE4WhPViSF0rsjSxKhfwGDU1Bo7USObSc_aIcgelo&s=akx0E6l2bnTjOvA-YxtonbW0M4b6bNg4nRwmcHNDo4Q&e=> > [image: Facebook Logo] > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_datastax&d=DwMFaQ&c=adz96Xi0w1RHqtPMowiL2g&r=IFj3MdIKYLLXIUhYdUGB0cTzTlxyCb7_VUmICBaYilU&m=uHzE4WhPViSF0rsjSxKhfwGDU1Bo7USObSc_aIcgelo&s=ncMlB41-6hHuqx-EhnM83-KVtjMegQ9c2l2zDzHAxiU&e=> > [image: Twitter Logo] <https://twitter.com/DataStax> [image: RSS > Feed] <https://www.datastax.com/blog/rss.xml> [image: Github Logo] > <https://github.com/datastax> > >
