If that’s the assumption on which this proposal is based, let’s discuss the evidence base first, as given the fundamentally different way they work (almost diametrically opposite), I would want to see a very high quality of evidence to support the claim. I don’t think we can resolve this conversation effectively until this question is settled. On 12 May 2023, at 16:19, Caleb Rackliffe <calebrackli...@gmail.com> wrote:
|
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Caleb Rackliffe
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Caleb Rackliffe
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX David Capwell
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Patrick McFadin
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Jeff Jirsa
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Patrick McFadin
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Mick Semb Wever
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Benedict
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Aleksey Yeshchenko
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Caleb Rackliffe
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Benedict
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Caleb Rackliffe
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Caleb Rackliffe
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Brandon Williams
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Benedict
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Caleb Rackliffe
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Benedict
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Caleb Rackliffe
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Caleb Rackliffe
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX Benedict
- Re: [DISCUSS] The future of CREATE INDEX David Capwell