Is it possible to deprecate it in the 4.1.x patch release? :)
- - -- --- ----- -------- ------------- Jacek Lewandowski czw., 9 mar 2023 o 18:11 Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > This is my feeling too, but I think we should accomplish this by > deprecating it first. I don't expect anything will change after the > deprecation period. > > Kind Regards, > Brandon > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 11:09 AM Jacek Lewandowski > <lewandowski.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I vote for removing it entirely. > > > > thanks > > - - -- --- ----- -------- ------------- > > Jacek Lewandowski > > > > > > czw., 9 mar 2023 o 18:07 Miklosovic, Stefan < > stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com> napisał(a): > >> > >> Derek, > >> > >> I have couple more points ... I do not think that extracting it to a > separate repository is "win". That code is on Hadoop 1.0.3. We would be > spending a lot of work on extracting it just to extract 10 years old code > with occasional updates (in my humble opinion just to make it compilable > again if the code around changes). What good is in that? We would have one > more place to take care of ... Now we at least have it all in one place. > >> > >> I believe we have four options: > >> > >> 1) leave it there so it will be like this is for next years with > questionable and diminishing usage > >> 2) update it to Hadoop 3.3 (I wonder who is going to do that) > >> 3) 2) and extract it to a separate repository but if we do 2) we can > just leave it there > >> 4) remove it > >> > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: Derek Chen-Becker <de...@chen-becker.org> > >> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 15:55 > >> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Role of Hadoop code in Cassandra 5.0 > >> > >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > >> > >> > >> > >> I think the question isn't "Who ... is still using that?" but more "are > we actually going to support it?" If we're on a version that old it would > appear that we've basically abandoned it, although there do appear to have > been refactoring (for other things) commits in the last couple of years. I > would be in favor of removal from 5.0, but at the very least, could it be > moved into a separate repo/package so that it's not pulling a relatively > large dependency subtree from Hadoop into our main codebase? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Derek > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 6:44 AM Miklosovic, Stefan < > stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com<mailto:stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com>> wrote: > >> Hi list, > >> > >> I stumbled upon Hadoop package again. I think there was some discussion > about the relevancy of Hadoop code some time ago but I would like to ask > this again. > >> > >> Do you think Hadoop code (1) is still relevant in 5.0? Who in the > industry is still using that? > >> > >> We might drop a lot of code and some Hadoop dependencies too (3) (even > their scope is "provided"). The version of Hadoop we build upon is 1.0.3 > which was released 10 years ago. This code does not have any tests nor > documentation on the website. > >> > >> There seems to be issues like this (2) and it seems like the solution > is to, basically, use Spark Cassandra connector instead which I would say > is quite reasonable. > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> (1) > https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/hadoop > >> (2) https://lists.apache.org/thread/jdy5hdc2l7l29h04dqol5ylroqos1y2p > >> (3) > https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/.build/parent-pom-template.xml#L507-L589 > >> > >> > >> -- > >> +---------------------------------------------------------------+ > >> | Derek Chen-Becker | > >> | GPG Key available at https://keybase.io/dchenbecker and | > >> | https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=derek%40chen-becker.org | > >> | Fngrprnt: EB8A 6480 F0A3 C8EB C1E7 7F42 AFC5 AFEE 96E4 6ACC | > >> +---------------------------------------------------------------+ > >> >
