> > My thoughts don't touch on CEPs inflight. >
For the sake of broadening the discussion, additional questions I think worthwhile to raise are… 1. What third parties, or other initiatives, are invested and/or working against the May deadline? and what are their views on changing it? 1a. If we push branching back to September, how confident are we that we'll get to GA before the December Summit? 2. What CEPs look like not landing by May that we consider a must-have this year? 2a. Is it just tail-end commits in those CEPs that won't make it? Can these land (with or without a waiver) during the alpha phase? 2b. If the final components to specified CEPs are not approved/appropriate to land during alpha, would it be better if the project commits to a one-off half-year release later in the year?
