“ So we can close out this discussion, let’s assume we’re only discussing
any interfaces we want to make promises for. We can have a separate
discussion about which those are if there is any disagreement.”
May I suggest we first clear this topic and then move to voting? I would
say I see confusion, not that much of a disagreement. Should we raise a
discussion for every feature flag for example? In another thread virtual
tables were brought in. I saw also other examples where people expressed
uncertainty. I personally feel I’ll be able to take a more informed
decision and vote if I first see this clarified.

I will be happy to put down a document and bring it for discussion if
people agree with that



On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 7:33, Aleksey Yeshchenko <alek...@apple.com> wrote:

> Bringing light to new proposed APIs no less important - if not more, for
> reasons already mentioned in this thread. For it’s not easy to change them
> later.
>
> Voting B.
>
>
> On 2 Feb 2023, at 10:15, Andrés de la Peña <adelap...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> If it's a breaking change, like removing a method or property, I think we
> would need a DISCUSS API thread prior to making changes. However, if the
> change is an addition, like adding a new yaml property or a JMX method, I
> think JIRA suffices.
>
>
>

Reply via email to