Works for me
> On May 18, 2022, at 7:36 AM, Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 from me on the grounds that I expect users to be more inclined to test an > alpha build of 4.1 rather than finding and pulling down a nightly. > Expectations of stability differ. > > On Wed, May 18, 2022, at 10:18 AM, Stefan Miklosovic wrote: >> Hi Mick, >> >> I do not mind having alpha1 out. It will help me with setting up all >> build pipelines for our plugins / tools / libraries as now I can not >> build it as snapshot is not released anywhere nor I can depend on it >> in Maven projects, for example. >> >> So yeah, +1 from me. >> >> Regards >> >> On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 11:40, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org >> <mailto:m...@apache.org>> wrote: >> > >> > Our release lifecycle docs¹ imply that we can release alphas despite >> > flaky test failures, which means we can cut and vote on a 4.1-alpha1 >> > release today. This is also on the presumption that point (2) on our >> > Cassandra CI Process docs² does not apply to pre-beta releases. >> > >> > Is there an appetite for this? >> > Any objections? >> > Any tickets about to land folk want us to wait on? >> > >> > regards, >> > Mick >> > >> > >> > 1) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Release+Lifecycle >> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Release+Lifecycle> >> > >> > 2) >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Cassandra+CI+Process >> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Cassandra+CI+Process>
