On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 12:47 AM Berenguer Blasi <berenguerbl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We shouldn't be at 15-20 failures but at 2 or 3. The problem is that those 2 > or 3 have already been hammered for over a year by 2 or 3 different > committers and they didn't crack. >
Last I checked circleci was almost fully green on trunk only, and the asf builds all had around 15-20 failures. For example, as of the last build I checked, trunk had 22 failures [1], 4.0 had 12 [2], 3.11 had 35 [3] and 3.0 had 25 [4]. [1] https://ci-cassandra.apache.org/job/Cassandra-trunk/901/ [2] https://ci-cassandra.apache.org/job/Cassandra-4.0/308/ [3] https://ci-cassandra.apache.org/job/Cassandra-3.11/300/ [4] https://ci-cassandra.apache.org/job/Cassandra-3.0/234 Looking at the failures they mostly seem to be consistent failures although there are some flakes as well. If I understand Josh's proposal correctly, and I could be mistaken, but if this vote passes it seems we would be unable to cut any release on any branch on the project? -Joey
