1. +1(nb) 2. +1(nb) 3. +1(nb) > On Oct 17, 2021, at 5:19 AM, Gary Dusbabek <gdusba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 for all three. > >> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 11:31 AM bened...@apache.org <bened...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I would like to start a vote on this CEP, split into three sub-decisions, >> as discussion has been circular for some time. >> >> 1. Do you support adopting this CEP? >> 2. Do you support the transaction semantics proposed by the CEP for >> Cassandra? >> 3. Do you support an incremental approach to developing transactions in >> Cassandra, leaving scope for future development? >> >> The first vote is a consensus vote of all committers, the second and third >> however are about project direction and therefore are simple majority votes >> of the PMC. >> >> Recall that all -1 votes must be accompanied by an explanation. If you >> reject the CEP only on grounds (2) or (3) you should not veto the proposal. >> If a majority reject grounds (2) or (3) then transaction developments will >> halt for the time being. >> >> This vote will be open for 72 hours. >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
