I support adopting this CEP, and the transaction semantics, and the incremental approach to developing transactions, so I'm +1 on all three
I also think that it is preferrable that we get to a point where the -1 be withdrawn, because I think it's a bad precedent to force the PMC to try to navigate the ambiguity of some of the words in the process/procedure documents. On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:08 PM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > 1. Do you support adopting this CEP? > > 2. Do you support the transaction semantics proposed by the CEP for > > Cassandra? > > 3. Do you support an incremental approach to developing transactions in > > Cassandra, leaving scope for future development? > > > > > 1. -1 > > There's discussions still ongoing around this CEP. I support the CEP but > believe it is important that the community takes the patience to let > everyone say their piece and feel that they have been heard. I do not see > that waiting a week, or two, before another vote risks the inclusion of > this CEP in this release cycle. I've certainly appreciated reading through > every question raised, and wouldn't object to the CEP page being updated to > include even more (but this is not a blocker for me). >
