On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 8:37 AM Paulo Motta <pauloricard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This sounds like a great feature!
I agree, this is going to be very useful. > I wonder if Consistencylevel is the best way to expose this to users > though, can't we implement this via another driver/protocol option ? Ie. > "delay_enabled" flag that would be a modifier to an existing CL. I too worry about adding more CLs, especially 'special' ones like these. > If we decide to go the CL route, I wonder if this isn't a good opportunity > to introduce pluggable consistency levels (CASSANDRA-8119 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8119>) so these would only > become available when the feature is enabled. I think it would be great to finally make CLs pluggable. There has already been a good amount of demand there. > My concern here is adding niche consistency levels to the default CL table > which may create confusion to non-power users. I agree. No matter how obviously we name them, someone will unknowingly use them, potentially generating some deep rabbit holes to go down with troubleshooting. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
