> > > > > Yes, we should perhaps remove target version from the template, and > > introduce guidance on describing stability impact etc. > > Strong +1 to remove this from the template. I got sucked into the mistake > of conflating implementation details and implications on where it lands > instead of staying high level in the "do we agree we need this". > > And I'm a +1 on the "I agree we need this". >
+1 to focusing on the _if_ (I think we need it). IMO we could keep the target version in the template and allow "To Be Decided (TBD)" as it could be useful for larger efforts or specific features. (I don't want to bikeshed on that though and won't complain if that field goes away.) Appreciate the debate and refocusing, though!
