It seems to me that CASSANDRA-16180 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16180>, CASSANDRA-16262 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16262> and CASSANDRA-16181 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16181> already highly improve the test coverage on distributed read and write paths. CASSANDRA-16262 sounds like a nice to have but should probably not block 4.0 GA I am +1 to push it out of 4.0-rc.
Thanks to you and Andres for all the work you contributed on CASSANDRA-15579 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15579>. It is some great work :-) On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:45 PM Caleb Rackliffe <calebrackli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I wanted to have a quick conversation about CASSANDRA-16262 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16262>. As I mentioned in > the Jira > < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16262?focusedCommentId=17273891&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17273891 > > > ... > > *"I was chatting w/ Andres de la Peña > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=adelapena> > the > other day, and it feels like there's an argument for allowing 4.0 to > release without this work being complete. We've certainly come a long way > w/ CASSANDRA-15579 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15579> already, filling > in > a number of gaps that existed."* > > Any strong opinions out there? >
