I think the intent of the milestones is meant to indicate that contributors view completion of those items as exit criteria for alpha / beta / RC; not necessarily that all items will be completed in strict order.
In principle I'd interpret work targeting earlier milestones as higher priority, but am generally glad to see any contribution that helps us close items in any pre-release milestone. :-) ________________________________________ From: Mick Semb Wever <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 10:27 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Cassandra 4.0 Dev Work Status > - *Progress: *We've closed out 18 issues > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CASSANDRA%20AND%20fixversion%20in%20(4.0%2C%204.0.0%2C%204.0-alpha%2C%204.0-beta)%20AND%20resolved%20%3E%3D%20-4w> > in the past 4 weeks of a total of 115 tickets > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12347782> across > 4.0-alpha, 4.0-beta, and 4.0. > shouldn't we only have issues closed in 4.0-alpha, given we are not yet at 4.0-beta and 4.0 ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
