+1
On 09/10/2019, 17:50, "Oleksandr Petrov" <oleksandr.pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
During NGCC/ACNA19 we've had quite a few conversations around the 4.0
release. Many (minor) features and changes suggested during that time are
possible to implement in 4.next without any problem. However, some changes
that seem to be very important for the community, which got mentioned in
several conversations, are not possible to implement without protocol
changes. By *protocol* changes here I mean both native and client protocol.
Here's a shortlist of the issues in question:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15349 Add “Going away”
message to the client protocol
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15350 Add CAS “uncertainty”
and “contention" messages that are currently propagated as a
WriteTimeoutException.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15351 Allow configuring
timeouts on the per-request basis
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15352 Replica failure
propagation to coordinator and client
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15299 Improve checksumming
and compression in protocol v5-beta
And, less importantly - CASSANDRA-14683 (paging state issue).
My suggestion would be to lift a freeze for all (or at least some) of these
issues, since they seem to be quite important for operators and each one of
them is extremely low risk, which means that any validation effort that has
already happened won't have to be re-done. All of the issues are fairly
easy to implement, which means they won't delay the release.
To my best knowledge, there's no client that fully supports 4.0, I think
doing this now actually makes sense, meaning that driver implementers won't
really have to redo anything.
Your thoughts on this are welcome,
-- Alex
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
