Will GossipingPropertyFileSnitch not be vulnerable to Gossip bugs where we lose hostId or some other fields when we restart C* for large clusters(~1000 instances)?
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 7:59 AM Jeff Jirsa <[email protected]> wrote: > We should, but the 4.0 features that log/reject verbs to invalid replicas > solves a lot of the concerns here > > -- > Jeff Jirsa > > > > On Oct 16, 2018, at 4:10 PM, Jeremy Hanna <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > We have had PropertyFileSnitch for a long time even though > GossipingPropertyFileSnitch is effectively a superset of what it offers and > is much less error prone. There are some unexpected behaviors when things > aren’t configured correctly with PFS. For example, if you replace nodes in > one DC and add those nodes to that DCs property files and not the other DCs > property files - the resulting problems aren’t very straightforward to > troubleshoot. > > > > We could try to improve the resilience and fail fast error checking and > error reporting of PFS, but honestly, why wouldn’t we deprecate and remove > PropertyFileSnitch? Are there reasons why GPFS wouldn’t be sufficient to > replace it? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
