On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Eric Evans <john.eric.ev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I believe you could accomplish a similar goal by making a multi-module > > project https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-multiple-modules.html > . > > Probably not as easy thanks to ant, but I think that is a better route. > One > > there actually are N dependent projects in the wild you can make the case > > for overhead which is both technical and in ASF based. > > This was my first thought: If we were using Maven, we'd probably > already have created this as a module[*]. > > > [*]: Maybe a surprise to some given how strongly I pushed back against > it in the Early Days, but we would be so much better off at this point > with Maven. > > > -- > Eric Evans > john.eric.ev...@gmail.com > Well the ant maven bit is a separate issue: It still could be done with ant, it could be done in a way that the port is very easy. http://ant.apache.org/easyant/history/trunk/ref/anttasks/SubModuletask.html
