Agreed. Changing vote to -1. Will re-open with Blake's idea. On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Brandon Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
> I retract my +1 and think instead we should open a vote on Blake's idea. > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Brandon Williams <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I think this is a better solution. > > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Blake Eggleston <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Maybe we should add [email protected] or something and send them > >> there? I don't subscribe to commits@ because it's too much email, I > >> would be interested in being notified when a PR is opened though. > >> > >> On March 20, 2017 at 3:00:47 PM, Jeff Jirsa ([email protected]) wrote: > >> > >> There's no reason for the dev list to get spammed everytime there's a > >> github PR. We know most of the time we prefer JIRAs for real code PRs, > but > >> with docs being in tree and low barrier to entry, we may want to accept > >> docs through PRs ( see https://issues.apache.org/jira > >> /browse/CASSANDRA-13256 > >> , and comment on it if you disagree). > >> > >> To make that viable, we should make it not spam dev@ with every > comment. > >> Therefore I propose we move github PR comments/actions to commits@ so > as > >> not to clutter the dev@ list. > >> > >> Voting to remain open for 72 hours. > >> > >> - Jeff > >> > > > > >
