https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/commit/f46a547827d3439b57baa5c3a11f8f9ad2d8b153
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Kant Kodali <[email protected]> wrote: > LOL They took down that image finally!! But I would still keep an eye on > what kind of fake benchmarks they might come up with. > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Amit Trivedi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It indeed is a marketing gimmick. By clubbing Cassandra with likes of >> HBase that favors consistency over availability, points under cons section >> are all true, just not true when applied to any one database from that >> group. >> >> Thanks and Regards >> >> Amit Trivedi >> >> On Feb 7, 2017, 7:32 AM -0500, [email protected], wrote: >> >> Deeper inside there is a diagram: >> >> >> >> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/mast >> er/docs/media/sql-nosql-newsql.png >> >> >> >> They compare to NoSQL along with Riak, HBase and Cassandra. >> >> >> >> Of course you CAN have a Cassandra cluster which is not fully available >> with loss of a dc nor consistent. >> >> >> >> Marketing 😊 >> >> >> >> Gesendet von meinem Windows 10 Phone >> >> >> >> *Von:* DuyHai Doan <[email protected]> >> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 7. Februar 2017 11:53 >> *An:* [email protected] >> *Cc:* [email protected] >> *Betreff:* Re: Why does CockroachDB github website say Cassandra has >> noAvailability on datacenter failure? >> >> >> >> The link you posted doesn't say anything about Cassandra >> >> Le 7 févr. 2017 11:41, "Kant Kodali" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> Why does CockroachDB github website say Cassandra has no Availability on >> datacenter failure? >> >> https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach >> >> >> >> >
