+1 On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Blake Eggleston <beggles...@apple.com> wrote:
> +1 > > > On January 13, 2017 at 12:38:55 PM, Michael Shuler (mich...@pbandjelly.org) > wrote: > > +1 to freeze with this clarified branch situation. > > -- > Michael > > On 01/13/2017 11:53 AM, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote: > > To elaborate further, under the current consensus there would be no 3.12 > release. > > > > Meaning that there are a few features that already made it to 3.X (3.12) > that would > > either: > > > > a) have to be reverted > > b) have to be discarded together with the remained of the 3.X branch > > > > If the vote goes through, I suggest we kill off the 3.X branch, and > cherry-pick the bug fixes > > that made it to 3.X back to the 3.11 branch. > > > > 3.11 branch will be the only one remaining. > > > > https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/cassandra-3.X/CHANGES.txt > > > > -- > > AY > > > > On 13 January 2017 at 17:21:22, Aleksey Yeschenko (alek...@apache.org) > wrote: > > > > Hi all! > > > > It seems like we have a general consensus on ending tick-tock at 3.11, > and moving > > on to stabilisation-only for 3.11.x series. > > > > In light of this, I suggest immediate feature freeze in the 3.X branch. > > > > Meaning that only bug fixes go to the 3.11/3.X branch from now on. > > > > All new features that haven’t be committed yet should go to trunk only > (4.0), if the vote passes. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > AY > > > >
