I take this response (a second time) as a pompous way to trivialize the
responses of others as to the point of their points being meaningless to
you. So either explain what this means, or accept the fact that you are
as Chris is exactly what people are claiming you to be. Abnoxious
bullies more interested in throwing your weight around and causing
havoc, destroying a community, rather than actually being motivated by
improving the ASF.
On 11/05/2016 06:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
How about a nice game of chess?
On Nov 5, 2016, at 1:15 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko <alek...@apache.org> wrote:
I’m sorry, but this statement is so at odds with common sense that I have to
call it out.
Of course your position grants your voice extra power. A lot of extra power,
like it or not (I have a feeling you quite like it, though).
In an ideal world, that power would entail corresponding duties:
care and consideration in your actions at least.
Instead, you are being hotheaded, impulsive, antagonising, and immature.
In what possible universe dropping that hammer threat from the ’20% off” email
thread,
then following up with a Game of Thrones youtube clip is alright?
That kind of behaviour is inappropriate for a board member. Frankly, it
wouldn’t be
appropriate for a greeter at Walmart. If you don’t see this, we do indeed have
bigger
problems.
--
AY
On 5 November 2016 at 14:57:13, Jim Jagielski (j...@jagunet.com) wrote:
But I love the ability of VP's and Board to simply pretend their positions carried no weight.
I would submit that whatever "weight" someone's position may
carry, it is due to *who* they are, and not *what* they are.
If we have people here in the ASF or in PMCs which really think
that titles manner in discussions like this, when one is NOT
speaking ex cathedra, then we have bigger problems. :)
