CASSANDRA-8292 From
Pig: org.apache.cassandra.exceptions.ConfigurationException: Expecting URI
in variable: [cassandra.config]. Please prefix the file with file:/// for
local files or file://<server>/ for remote files. PIG not tested

As advertised. I didn't run the pig tests before commit so that's 100% on
me; I didn't realize we had a separate target for those at that point..
Should be caught by a) me not repeating that mistake and b) our jenkins job.


On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Jake Luciani <jak...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here is my response.
>
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8332> T Jake Luciani Null
> pointer after droping keyspace Add/drop keyspace not tested under load,
> with server logs checked for errors
>
> To detect this we would need a test to write to a table,  wait for
> compaction to start then drop the table before the compaction finished
> and check the log for an exception
> (there was no impact to the system other than the error)
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Tyler Hobbs <ty...@datastax.com> wrote:
> > Here are my responses for my tickets:
> >
> > CASSANDRA-7910 - wildcard prepared statements are incorrect after a
> column
> > is added to the table
> >
> > As part of the ticket, I added general dtests for prepared statement
> > invalidation after ALTER TABLE statements:
> >
> https://github.com/riptano/cassandra-dtest/blob/18cd4adaba65a9f424b5b9f52f4bf510b6c7e47f/cql_tests.py#L5170-L5204
> .
> > In general, though, the dtests don't have great coverage on prepared
> > statements.  We could add an abstraction layer over query execution to
> use
> > prepared vs unprepared statements with an environment variable.
> >
> > CASSANDRA-8264 - Problems with multicolumn relations and COMPACT STORAGE
> >
> > I'm not sure of the best way to catch missing coverage for table settings
> > like COMPACT STORAGE is.  Theoretically a careful inspection of
> code/branch
> > coverage would probably reveal this.  Of course, we could also ensure all
> > (applicable) tests cover both COMPACT and non-COMPACT, but other table
> > settings like the compaction strategy and caching could also affect some
> > tests.  I suppose COMPACT STORAGE is the most likely to make a
> difference,
> > so perhaps we should focus on covering that first and postpone coverage
> for
> > the other attributes until we have a more general solution?
> >
> > CASSANDRA-8286 - Regression in ORDER BY
> >
> > The dtests did catch this.  We did not ship the bug in 2.0, but
> > unfortunately, it did make it into the 2.1.2 release despite the failing
> > test. (The test failed shortly before the release, which had its vote
> over
> > the weekend and thus missed test-engineering input.) After the 2.1.2
> > release, we decided to make changes to the release process to prevent
> that:
> > ensure a full test run completes before voting, and require sign-off
> from a
> > test engineer before releasing.
> >
> > CASSANDRA-8288 - cqlsh describe needs to show 'sstable_compression'
> >
> > We do have round-trip tests for DESCRIBE in the python driver (
> >
> https://github.com/datastax/python-driver/blob/c381fa0f04dbeb9ac389fa017bac8d9cc2ded0be/tests/integration/standard/test_metadata.py#L41
> ),
> > but they don't cover every config option permutation.  Although we now
> have
> > coverage for this particular case, adding a suite of tests for this
> should
> > be pretty straightforward, so I'll open a ticket for that.
> >
> > CASSANDRA-8302 - Filtering for CONTAINS (KEY) on frozen collection
> > clustering columns within a partition does not work
> >
> > This bug didn't ship, but wasn't caught by a failing test.  I'm not sure
> > how we could spot the lack of coverage on this -- even branch coverage
> > analysis wouldn't show this.  Perhaps taking the time to manually create
> a
> > test-coverage matrix (and post it in jira) when developing the feature is
> > the best approach?  The matrix is too large to simply cover mentally, it
> > seems.
> >
> > CASSANDRA-8408 - limit appears to replace page size under certain
> conditions
> >
> > This was discovered while more thorough tests for paging were being
> written
> > (by the reporter).  Obviously, these should have existed when the feature
> > was written, but part of the problem was that it required driver changes
> to
> > test and we weren't using the native protocol python driver for dtests
> > yet.  We still have a bit of a problem with testing new protocol
> features,
> > but we typically add python driver support for the features while
> > developing them so that we can at least run relevant dtests locally.
> Once
> > https://github.com/riptano/cassandra-dtest/issues/188 is complete, it
> > should be easier to write dtests against native protocol
> changes/features.
> >
> > CASSANDRA-8410 - Select with many IN values on clustering columns can
> > result in a StackOverflowError
> >
> > Agreed, we need boundary tests for large values of IN clauses, large
> > inserts/update/deletes/batches (number of query params, number of
> partition
> > keys, and number of clustering keys)
> >
> > CASSANDRA-8451 - NPE when writetime() or ttl() are nested inside function
> > call
> >
> > I did add a regression dtest for this.  We do have tests for composition
> of
> > functions, but writetime() and ttl() are special functions and didn't
> have
> > the specific test coverage they deserved.  (I did add dtest coverage as
> > part of the ticket.)
> >
> > CASSANDRA-8490 - DISTINCT queries with LIMITs or paging are incorrect
> when
> > partitions are delete
> >
> > We did have test coverage for this query in general, but the tests didn't
> > cover deletes.  I think that in general, our paging tests should all
> > exercise deletes (of partitions, rows, and individual cells).  I propose
> > opening a jira ticket for this.
> >
> > CASSANDRA-8512 - cqlsh unusable after encountering schema mismatch
> >
> > I'm not sure what to do here.  Test cqlsh with various clusters in
> degraded
> > states?  In general, cqlsh is way undertested -- we need some better
> > infrastructure for making it testable.
> >
> > CASSANDRA-8550 - Internal pagination in CQL3 index queries creating
> > substantial overhead
> >
> > I'm not generally involved in performance work, so I'm not familiar with
> > what tools we have here.  Have we made progress towards a standard set of
> > benchmarks for various queries and configurations?
> >
> > CASSANDRA-8563 - cqlsh broken for some thrift created tables
> >
> > This is one of the ugly (and rarely used) corners of Thrift where CQL
> > compatibility isn't great.  We should probably create a test suite of the
> > most bizarre Thrift schemas and confirm that CQL compatibility works.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Ariel Weisberg <
> ariel.weisb...@datastax.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Repeated with sort
> >>    *Key* *Assignee* *Summary* *Revisit reason*  CASSANDRA-8285
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8285> Aleksey
> Yeschenko
> >> Move
> >> all hints related tasks to hints private executor Pierre's reproducer
> >> represents something we weren't doing, but that users are. Is that now
> >> being tested?  CASSANDRA-8462
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8462> Aleksey
> >> Yeschenko Upgrading
> >> a 2.0 to 2.1 breaks CFMetaData on 2.0 nodes Have additional dtest
> coverage,
> >> need to do this in kitchen sink tests  CASSANDRA-8640
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8640> Anthony Cozzie
> >> Paxos
> >> requires all nodes for CAS If PAXOS is not supposed to require all nodes
> >> for CAS we should be able to fail nodes or a certain number of nodes and
> >> still continue to CAS (test availability of CAS under failure
> conditions).
> >> No regression test.  CASSANDRA-8677
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8677> Ariel Weisberg
> >> rpc_interface
> >> and listen_interface generate NPE on startup when specified interface
> >> doesn't exist Missing unit tests checking error messages for
> >> DatabaseDescriptor  CASSANDRA-8577
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8577> Artem Aliev
> Values
> >> of set types not loading correctly into Pig Full set of interactions
> with
> >> PIG not validated  CASSANDRA-7704
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7704> Benedict
> >> FileNotFoundException
> >> during STREAM-OUT triggers 100% CPU usage Streaming testing didn't
> >> reproduce this before release  CASSANDRA-8383
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8383> Benedict
> Memtable
> >> flush may expire records from the commit log that are in a later
> memtable
> >> No
> >> regression test, no follow up ticket. Could/should this have been
> >> reproducable as an actual bug?  CASSANDRA-8429
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8429> Benedict Some
> keys
> >> unreadable during compaction Running stress in CI would have caught
> this,
> >> and we're going to do that  CASSANDRA-8459
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8459> Benedict
> >> "autocompaction"
> >> on reads can prevent memtable space reclaimation What would have
> reproduced
> >> this before release?  CASSANDRA-8499
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8499> Benedict Ensure
> >> SSTableWriter cleans up properly after failure Testing error paths? Any
> way
> >> to test things in a loop to detect leaks?  CASSANDRA-8513
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8513> Benedict
> >> SSTableScanner
> >> may not acquire reference, but will still release it when closed This
> had a
> >> user visible component, what test could have caught it befor erelease?
> >> CASSANDRA-8619 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8619>
> >> Benedict using CQLSSTableWriter gives ConcurrentModificationException
> What
> >> kind of test would have caught this before release?  CASSANDRA-8632
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8632> Benedict
> >> cassandra-stress
> >> only generating a single unique row We rely on stress for performance
> >> testing, that might mean it needs real testing that demonstrates it
> >> generates load that looks like the load it is supposed to be generating.
> >> CASSANDRA-8668 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8668>
> >> Benedict We don't enforce offheap memory constraints; regression
> introduced
> >> by 7882 Memory constraints was a supported feature/UI, but not
> completely
> >> tested before release. Could this have been found most effectively by a
> >> unit test or a blackbox test?  CASSANDRA-8719
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8719> Benedict Using
> >> thrift HSHA with offheap_objects appears to corrupt data Untested
> >> configuration before release, this would be straightforward if we ran
> with
> >> it?  CASSANDRA-8726 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8726>
> >> Benedict throw OOM in Memory if we fail to allocate OOM test Cassandra?
> Try
> >> and validate that it fails cleanly and can be restarted on OOM? Same for
> >> disk full.  CASSANDRA-8018
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8018> Benjamin Lerer
> >> Cassandra
> >> seems to insert twice in custom PerColumnSecondaryIndex Custom secondary
> >> indexes not tested before release?  CASSANDRA-8231
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8231> Benjamin Lerer
> >> Wrong
> >> size of cached prepared statements Expected cache capacity not validated
> >> with actual cache capcaity, no regression test  CASSANDRA-8365
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8365> Benjamin Lerer
> >> CamelCase
> >> name is used as index name instead of lowercase How can we establish UI
> >> consistency?  CASSANDRA-8421
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8421> Benjamin Lerer
> >> Cassandra
> >> 2.1.1 & Cassandra 2.1.2 UDT not returning value for LIST type as UDT Is
> >> there a test that could have found this condition before release?
> >> CASSANDRA-8514 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8514>
> >> Benjamin
> >> Lerer ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in nodetool cfhistograms Not
> released,
> >> but not caught by automated tests either  CASSANDRA-8243
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8243> Björn Hegerfors
> >> DTCS
> >> can leave time-overlaps, limiting ability to expire entire SSTables
> >> Performance
> >> improving fast path not tested in a representative way  CASSANDRA-8448
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8448> Brandon
> >> Williams "Comparison
> >> method violates its general contract" in AbstractEndpointSnitch This
> just
> >> happens periodically? Was the snitch no tested under load and the log
> >> output checked for errors?  CASSANDRA-8028
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8028> Carl Yeksigian
> >> Unable
> >> to compute when histogram overflowed Histogram output not tested with
> >> representative data sets, no regression test  CASSANDRA-8122
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8122> Carl Yeksigian
> >> Undeclare
> >> throwable exception while executing 'nodetool netstats localhost'
> nodetool
> >> not tested against cluster throughout lifecycle, no regression test
> >> CASSANDRA-8695 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8695>
> >> Chris
> >> Lockfort thrift column definition list sometimes immutable What user
> >> visible activities reproduced this, could we have done that before
> release?
> >> CASSANDRA-8588 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8588>
> Dave
> >> Brosius Fix DropTypeStatements isusedBy for maps (typo ignored values)
> Not
> >> released, but was it detected before release by an automated test?
> >> CASSANDRA-8652 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8652>
> >> Edward
> >> Ribeiro DROP TABLE should also drop BATCH prepared statements
> associated to
> >> it Not sure if this is an optimization or fixes a user visible issue,
> but
> >> could this have been detected by exercising the functionality better
> before
> >> release.  CASSANDRA-8694
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8694> Jeff Jirsa
> Repair
> >> of
> >> empty keyspace hangs rather than ignoring the request Missing boundary
> >> condition test, requesting operation on empty, non-existent, or not
> >> applicable entity.  CASSANDRA-8687
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8687> Jeremiah Jordan
> >> Keyspace
> >> should also check Config.isClientMode Is there a way to test for missing
> >> Config.isClientMode checks?  CASSANDRA-8579
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8579> Jimmy Mårdell
> >> sstablemetadata
> >> can't load org.apache.cassandra.tools.SSTableMetadataViewer Running C*
> from
> >> source tree not representative of behavior of deployed builds
> >> CASSANDRA-8401 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8401>
> >> Jonathan
> >> Ellis dropping a CF doesn't remove the latency-sampling task Another
> >> argument for a schema change stress test, maybe tracking for constant
> >> memory utilization  CASSANDRA-8292
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8292> Joshua McKenzie
> >> From
> >> Pig: org.apache.cassandra.exceptions.ConfigurationException: Expecting
> URI
> >> in variable: [cassandra.config]. Please prefix the file with file:///
> for
> >> local files or file://<server>/ for remote files. PIG not tested
> >> CASSANDRA-8211 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8211>
> >> Marcus
> >> Eriksson Overlapping sstables in L1+ Noted hard to reproduce, but still
> is
> >> there a way we could have, no regression test  CASSANDRA-8316
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8316> Marcus Eriksson
> >> "Did
> >> not get positive replies from all endpoints" error on incremental repair
> >> What
> >> were users doing differently, is there a reproducer for this running
> now?
> >> CASSANDRA-8320 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8320>
> >> Marcus
> >> Eriksson 2.1.2: NullPointerException in SSTableWriter What were users
> doing
> >> that caused this, are we doing that?  CASSANDRA-8386
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8386> Marcus Eriksson
> >> Make
> >> sure we release references to sstables after incremental repair Is
> there a
> >> higher level test that could have observed this failure?  CASSANDRA-8432
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8432> Marcus Eriksson
> >> Standalone
> >> Scrubber broken for LCS Standalone scrubber not tested, no regression
> test
> >> CASSANDRA-8458 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8458>
> >> Marcus
> >> Eriksson Don't give out positions in an sstable beyond its first/last
> >> tokens Streaming
> >> not done in realistic scenario with validation of logging
> CASSANDRA-8463
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8463> Marcus Eriksson
> >> Constant
> >> compaction under LCS What would have reproduced this before release?
> >> CASSANDRA-8510 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8510>
> >> Marcus
> >> Eriksson CompactionManager.submitMaximal may leak resources Not a user
> >> visible problem, so difficult to catch in test, but is there a way
> >> CASSANDRA-8525 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8525>
> >> Marcus
> >> Eriksson Bloom Filter truePositive counter not updated on key cache hit
> >> User
> >> visible metric not accurate, but only in one config. Possible to guess
> >> correct FP ratio and validate while exploring config space?
> CASSANDRA-8532
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8532> Marcus Eriksson
> Fix
> >> calculation of expected write size during compaction Did this manifest
> as a
> >> user visible issue, could we have tested for that?  CASSANDRA-8537
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8537> Marcus Eriksson
> >> ConcurrentModificationException
> >> while executing 'nodetool cleanup' Nodetool cleanup not tested before
> >> release  CASSANDRA-8562
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8562> Marcus Eriksson
> Fix
> >> checking available disk space before compaction starts Is there a user
> >> visible negative impact, could it have been tested for?  CASSANDRA-8580
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8580> Marcus Eriksson
> >> AssertionErrors
> >> after activating unchecked_tombstone_compaction with leveled compaction
> How
> >> could this have been reproduced before release? No regression test
> >> CASSANDRA-8623 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8623>
> >> Marcus
> >> Eriksson sstablesplit fails *randomly* with Data component is missing
> >> Feature
> >> not tested before release? No regression test  CASSANDRA-8635
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8635> Marcus Eriksson
> >> STCS
> >> cold sstable omission does not handle overwrites without reads If this
> >> workload is a challenge for certain kinds of optimizations we should
> test
> >> it if we think it could happen again.  CASSANDRA-7538
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7538> Sam Tunnicliffe
> >> Truncate
> >> of a CF should also delete Paxos CF Truncate not tested with PAXOS, what
> >> else?  CASSANDRA-8280
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8280> Sam
> >> Tunnicliffe Cassandra crashing on inserting data over 64K into indexed
> >> strings Added tests are good example, could focusing on testing all
> access
> >> paths and boundary conditions per access path have prevented this
> >> CASSANDRA-8370 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8370>
> Sam
> >> Tunnicliffe cqlsh doesn't handle LIST statements correctly cqlsh
> untested
> >> functionality, no regression test?  CASSANDRA-7801
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7801> Sylvain
> Lebresne A
> >> successful INSERT with CAS does not always store data in the DB after a
> >> DELETE Multiple access paths for data not tested together
> CASSANDRA-8558
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8558> Sylvain Lebresne
> >> deleted
> >> row still can be selected out Validate that deleted data stays deleted
> >> under * conditions (big matrix of interactions here with different
> >> configurations, streaming, repair, cleanup, scrub). Deleted data coming
> >> back shows up a lot.  CASSANDRA-8332
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8332> T Jake Luciani
> Null
> >> pointer after droping keyspace Add/drop keyspace not tested under load,
> >> with server logs checked for errors  CASSANDRA-7910
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7910> Tyler Hobbs
> >> wildcard
> >> prepared statements are incorrect after a column is added to the table
> >> Alter
> >> table not tested concurrently with ?  CASSANDRA-8264
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8264> Tyler Hobbs
> >> Problems
> >> with multicolumn relations and COMPACT STORAGE How can we catch
> >> interactions like compact storage not being covered by the test
> >> CASSANDRA-8286 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8286>
> >> Tyler
> >> Hobbs Regression in ORDER BY There were tests that failed in some
> versions,
> >> but not all? Did this not ship?  CASSANDRA-8288
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8288> Tyler Hobbs
> cqlsh
> >> describe needs to show 'sstable_compression': '' Roundtrip test for
> >> describe schema?  CASSANDRA-8302
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8302> Tyler Hobbs
> >> Filtering
> >> for CONTAINS (KEY) on frozen collection clustering columns within a
> >> partition does not work More untested combinations, could we have
> spotted
> >> that there was an interaction and tested it? Or did this not ship?
> >> CASSANDRA-8408 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8408>
> >> Tyler
> >> Hobbs limit appears to replace page size under certain conditions No
> test
> >> that validates that paging returns the expected number of results?
> Another
> >> of the genre of queries we support but don't test all the combinations
> >> CASSANDRA-8410 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8410>
> >> Tyler
> >> Hobbs Select with many IN values on clustering columns can result in a
> >> StackOverflowError Another missing boundary conditions test, test
> maximum
> >> size in clause against *  CASSANDRA-8451
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8451> Tyler Hobbs NPE
> >> when
> >> writetime() or ttl() are nested inside function call Is this testable?
> Can
> >> we check that functions compose correctly or validate that they are
> >> inherently composable. No regression test.  CASSANDRA-8490
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8490> Tyler Hobbs
> >> DISTINCT
> >> queries with LIMITs or paging are incorrect when partitions are
> >> deleted Untested
> >> query forms, no regression test  CASSANDRA-8512
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8512> Tyler Hobbs
> cqlsh
> >> unusable after encountering schema mismatch cqlsh not tested with other
> >> functionality active  CASSANDRA-8550
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8550> Tyler Hobbs
> >> Internal
> >> pagination in CQL3 index queries creating substantial overhead
> Pagination
> >> not performance tested with representative data models  CASSANDRA-8563
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8563> Tyler Hobbs
> cqlsh
> >> broken for some thrift created tables. Validate mixed CQL thrift
> >> interactions? Possibly abstract everything to be done either by CQL or
> >> Thrift and then permute? Seems low value, but necessary if both are
> claimed
> >> to be supported.  CASSANDRA-8733
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8733> Tyler Hobbs List
> >> prepend reverses item order There was a test so sometimes this just
> >> happens.
> >> CASSANDRA-8641 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8641>
> >> *Unassigned* Repair causes a large number of tiny SSTables User says
> >> something doesn't work for them? Could we have anticipated that vnodes
> >> would not work as formulated for this case.  CASSANDRA-8675
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8675> *Unassigned*
> COPY
> >> TO/FROM broken for newline characters COPY TO/FROM not tested with
> >> representative data  CASSANDRA-8691
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8691> *Unassigned*
> >> SSTableReader.getPosition()
> >> does not correctly filter out queries that exceed its bounds Is there a
> >> scenario where this is user visible, should we test for that?
> >> CASSANDRA-8688 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8688>
> Yuki
> >> Morishita Standalone sstableupgrade tool throws exception Tool not
> tested
> >> before release, no regression test
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tyler Hobbs
> > DataStax <http://datastax.com/>
>
>
>
> --
> http://twitter.com/tjake
>



-- 
Joshua McKenzie
DataStax -- The Apache Cassandra Company

Reply via email to