On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I do think that CQL tests in general make more sense as unit tests, > but I'm not so anal that I'm going to insist on rewriting existing > ones. But in theory, if I had an infinite army of interns, sure. I'd > have one of them do that. :) > > But in the real world, compared to saying "we don't have any cql unit > tests, so we should always write them as dtests to be consistent" I > think having mixed unit + dtests is the lesser of evils. > Fair enough. I'll try to make CQL tests as unit tests from now on as much as possible (I can't promise a few misfire in the short term). Let's hope you find your infinite intern army someday. -- Sylvain
