+1 On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Jake Luciani <jak...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com>wrote: > >> So, 1.0.3 was not as solid as one would have hoped and CASSANDRA-3510 is >> fairly bad. We've also fixed a few concurrency bugs and more, so it is >> worth >> pushing all this to the use now. I thus propose the following artifacts for >> release as 1.0.4. >> >> SVN: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-1.0@1206131 >> Artifacts: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-248/org/apache/cassandra/apache-cassandra/1.0.4/ >> Staging repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-248/ >> >> The artifacts as well as the debian package are also available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~slebresne/ >> >> Please note that there is a unit test failure for ConsistencyLevelTest. >> However, this is a problem with the test itself, not the code (see >> CASSANDRA-3531), so I don't see a point in holding the release for that. >> >> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). >> >> [1]: http://goo.gl/SJJvx (CHANGES.txt) >> [2]: http://goo.gl/794fz (NEWS.txt) >> > > > > -- > http://twitter.com/tjake >
-- Eric Evans Acunu | http://www.acunu.com | @acunu
