ping. still waiting for two more +1's from cassandra committers

- Stephen

---
Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the
screen
On 29 Apr 2011 14:02, "Stephen Connolly" <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> OK CQL has been dropped from this release, I need two more binding +1's to
> release what remains (all & thrift)
>
> On 28 April 2011 20:42, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
>wrote:
>
>> ok well I will see about deleting it from the staging repo, can I get a
>> conditional + 1 on that basis?
>>
>> - Stephen
>>
>> ---
>> Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
>> words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on
the
>> screen
>> On 28 Apr 2011 20:31, "Eric Evans" <eev...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 16:44 +0100, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>> >> > Unlike the RPC, CQL is meant to be stable. It is a significant
>> >> feature
>> >> > that you should be able to use the same version of a driver across
>> >> many
>> >> > versions of Cassandra. This is why the versions must be different,
>> >> so
>> >> > that you can evaluate each new driver version in the context of how
>> >> it
>> >> > changed, not (necessarily )how Cassandra changed during some
>> >> arbitrary
>> >> > release.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> This version number is all about versioning the information in the
>> >> __pom__. The pom defines transitive dependencies. You might not
>> >> rebuild the cql jar at all, but keep redeploying with different poms
>> >> (each getting their own version number... because we can only use a
>> >> version number once)... yes that is somewhat wasteful of space on the
>> >> central repository, but that's the way it works... [1]
>> >>
>> >> The 0.8.0-beta1 version number is only for the coordinates of the pom
>> >> of cassandra-cql that will pull down the dependencies for using cql
>> >> with cassandra 0.8.0-beta1.
>> >>
>> >> If that subtlety helps you understand the versioning I have chosen for
>> >> the poms, well that is better.
>> >
>> > It sounds to me like you need to omit the CQL jar entirely then, and
not
>> > add it to Maven Central except as a different project.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Eric Evans
>> > eev...@rackspace.com
>> >
>>

Reply via email to