To be clear, I purposely removed the source archive (now archives) from the Maven deployment, but apparently that also removed them from the signing process. This will need to be fixed in the build.
Matt On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 2:07 PM Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Mark. I have generated the signatures manually and added to the dev > distribution repo, revision 30249. > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 1:52 PM Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> * sha512 ok* builds fine* passes TCK (after export LANG=en_EN, but this >> is a known TCK bug)* RAT passes* signature fine >> But I cannot find the asc signature nor can I find the source zip on >> repository.apache.org. >> LieGrue,strub >> >> On Saturday, 20 October 2018, 16:45:54 CEST, Roberto Cortez >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> Thank you Matt! >> >> > On 18 Oct 2018, at 13:01, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > I've created a 2.0.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up >> for >> > a vote: >> > >> > Git source tag: >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=bval.git;a=tag;h=e828a49ce4bcb8701ddc023f630ef3b18adad950 >> > >> > >> > Maven staging repo: >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-1005 >> > >> > >> > Source release: >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bval/source (r30138) >> > >> > Generated site: >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bval/2.0.0-RC1/site/index.html >> > >> > >> > PGP release keys: >> > http://www.apache.org/dist/bval/KEYS >> > >> > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> > >> > [ ] +1 approve >> > [ ] +0 no opinion >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > >
