I have started a new discussion minutes ago in TiP ML on this subject , you are invited to participate or read other opinions as well .
http://lists.idyll.org/pipermail/testing-in-python/2014-February/005854.html On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Apache Bloodhound < [email protected]> wrote: > #770: Location of test cases for bloodhound_multiproduct is not consistent > with > other projects > ---------------------------+-------------------- > Reporter: rjollos | Owner: nobody > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: major | Milestone: > Component: multiproduct | Version: > Resolution: | Keywords: > ---------------------------+-------------------- > > Comment (by olemis): > > Replying to [comment:2 rjollos]: > > Do you have a reason other than just personal preference? Trac has > already chosen to locate tests in a `tests` subdirectory of the module. > > I really do not recommend doing this . > > > In general, it is logical to maintain consistency with Trac on things > like this (and code style issue), > > I do not think that's a good reference to follow > > > unless there is a solid argument to go a different direction, and the > argument can cite significant advantages. > > ... considering the facts in comment:3 > > -- > Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/770#comment:4> > Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/> > The Apache Bloodhound issue tracker > -- Regards, Olemis - @olemislc Apache(tm) Bloodhound contributor http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound http://blood-hound.net Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
