+1 to archive them (legacy/attic dir) to start.

- Ray

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 3:33 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It sounds like a good idea to have legacy/attic folder. If after some
> months, we don’t have any feedback, we will delete.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 21 août 2020 à 09:05, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
> >
> > Is pushing all these legacy pages in a legacy/ folder (manually, does not
> > need to be automatized) and if anyone complains about this lack then we
> add
> > it back otherwise we just keep them hanging in a folder?
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
> >
> >
> > Le ven. 21 août 2020 à 08:31, David Jencks <[email protected]> a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> There are some quite old pages in the website that are in html, about
> the
> >> CT test results from the 0.2, 0.3, and 1.0.0 releases.  An example is
> >>
> https://aries.apache.org/downloads/ct/0.3/org.osgi.test.cases.blueprint.html
> >> <
> >>
> https://aries.apache.org/downloads/ct/0.3/org.osgi.test.cases.blueprint.html
> >.
> >> FWIW, the link to this page in the current site is broken.
> >>
> >> Could we drop these?  I can convert them to appear in the Antora site,
> but
> >> it would take a few hours and increase the compexity of the UI bundle,
> so
> >> if there’s agreement to drop them as obsolete I’d rather not put in the
> >> time.
> >>
> >> I think this is all the relevant files in the current website:
> >>
> >> /downloads/ct/current-release/org.osgi.test.cases.transaction.html
> >> /downloads/ct/current-release/org.osgi.test.cases.blueprint.secure.html
> >> /downloads/ct/current-release/org.osgi.test.cases.jmx.html
> >> /downloads/ct/current-release/org.osgi.test.cases.jndi.html
> >> /downloads/ct/current-release/org.osgi.test.cases.blueprint.html
> >> /downloads/ct/current-release/org.osgi.test.cases.blueprint.java5.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.2-incubating/org.osgi.test.cases.transaction.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.2-incubating/org.osgi.test.cases.blueprint.secure.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.2-incubating/org.osgi.test.cases.jmx.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.2-incubating/org.osgi.test.cases.jndi.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.2-incubating/org.osgi.test.cases.blueprint.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.2-incubating/org.osgi.test.cases.blueprint.java5.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.2-incubating/testresults.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.3/org.osgi.test.cases.transaction.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.3/org.osgi.test.cases.blueprint.secure.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.3/org.osgi.test.cases.jmx.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.3/org.osgi.test.cases.jndi.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.3/org.osgi.test.cases.blueprint.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.3/org.osgi.test.cases.blueprint.java5.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.3/org.osgi.test.cases.jndi.secure.html
> >> /downloads/ct/0.3/testresults.html
> >> /downloads/ct/1.0.0/org.osgi.test.cases.transaction.html
> >> /downloads/ct/1.0.0/org.osgi.test.cases.blueprint.secure.html
> >> /downloads/ct/1.0.0/org.osgi.test.cases.jmx.html
> >> /downloads/ct/1.0.0/org.osgi.test.cases.jpa.html
> >> /downloads/ct/1.0.0/org.osgi.test.cases.jndi.html
> >> /downloads/ct/1.0.0/org.osgi.test.cases.blueprint.html
> >> /downloads/ct/1.0.0/org.osgi.test.cases.blueprint.java5.html
> >> /downloads/ct/1.0.0/org.osgi.test.cases.jndi.secure.html
> >> /downloads/ct/1.0.0/org.osgi.test.cases.jndi.43.html
> >>
> >>
> >> The “current-release” ones don’t seem to be in the current
> >> aries-antora-site repo, so I suspect they are not generated through CMS
> but
> >> through some other unknown process. My impression of the svn website
> >> publishing is that if someone just commits a page to it using some
> process
> >> it stays forevermore unless it is explicitly removed.  Otherwise I made
> a
> >> mistake somewhere.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> David Jencks
>
>

-- 
*Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
 (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
 (@Liferay)

Reply via email to