Yep. Indeed. On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 3:47 PM Elad Kalif <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think a new release of amazon provider is required. The provider > did not limit the library version so it is compatible with the new library > release > > בתאריך יום ג׳, 31 במרץ 2026, 11:48, מאת Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>: > > > Great! - Thanks Niko! We will look into releasing the Amazon ad-hoc > > provider before Airflow 3.2 is out. > > > > J. > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 4:37 AM Oliveira, Niko <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > It is passed Sunday, so this has technically passed, but the Redshift > > team > > > has completed the changes and pushed a release that is compatible with > > > Python 3.14. > > > > > > Release notes: > > > > > > https://github.com/aws/amazon-redshift-python-driver/commit/f034099eea1620e499641db071f81ec1866f698c > > > > > > The release: > https://pypi.org/project/redshift-connector/2.1.13/#history > > > > > > So for what it is worth I vote -1 to this lazy consensus now :) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Niko > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2026 5:05 AM > > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > > Subject: RE: [EXT] [LAZY CONSENSUS] Suspending Amazon provider for > Python > > > 3.14 (temporary) > > > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > > > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and > > know > > > the content is safe. > > > > > > > > > > > > AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur > externe. > > > Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne > > pouvez > > > pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain > > que > > > le contenu ne présente aucun risque. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sunday of course. Sorry been copying it on the phone and somehow I > lost a > > > day this week and thought it's Wednesday :) > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2026, 12:52 Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello here, > > > > > > > > I would like to call for a lazy consensus on suspensding Amazon > > provider > > > > (despite it being by default included in the reference images) for > > Python > > > > 3.14 - which Ilya relentlessly worked on. > > > > > > > > > > > > Ths is the last blocker from releasing the image. Including snowflake > > > > releasing 3.14 provider literally today. > > > > > > > > Our separated Governance process did not include the part about > > > suspension > > > > (as de-facto it is not a separate lifecycle stage - provider can be > > > > suspended in any lifecycle stage). But I added a paragraph describing > > it > > > > and stating that steward is responsible for solving problems leading > to > > > > suspension and bringing it back (we already had that rule before > adding > > > > stewards - the party responsible was simply unnamed). > > > > > > > > PR for the governance process here: > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/64252 > > > > > > > > The consensus will run till Satirday, 29 March, 1 pm CET (72 hours > > from > > > > now). > > > > > > > > J. > > > > > > > > > >
