Thanks to everyone who participated today.

The meeting #3: Jan 19, 2022:

Notes here: 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RglGoiaRdFilu5DjmoZWYVteClu09RA-aRWdfVL16tQ/edit#
Recording 
here:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SMFzazuY1kg4B4r11wNt8EQ_PmTDRKq6/view

Action items (details in the links):

* AIP-43 - final comments and we send it up for voting (Mateusz)
* AIP-44 - some more comments and clarification and we will try to
make sure we reach consensus before we send it up for voting (Jarek)
* Further discussion on new proposals to be addressed offline/next meeting.

J.

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:13 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Kind reminder - we have the #3 meeting today at 8pm CET
>
> Proposed agenda:
>
> Intro: Broad goals of the two upcoming AIPs - Jarek Potiuk
> AIP-43 Walkthrough [1] - Mateusz Henc
> AIP-44 Walkthrough [2] - Jarek Potiuk
> Initial conversations:
>
> Ping Zhang/Kevin Yang" Parsing service, Dag serialization Docker env, Remove 
> double parsing [3]
>
> [1] AIP-43 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-43+DAG+Processor+separation
> [2] AIP-44 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-44+Airflow+Internal+API
> [3] Remove double parsing - 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Remove+double+dag+parsing+in+airflow+run
>
> Notes will be kept here: 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RglGoiaRdFilu5DjmoZWYVteClu09RA-aRWdfVL16tQ/edit#
> The meeting will be recorded.
>
> J.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 4:09 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Also kind reminder: please DO review and comment the proposals:
>>
>> * AIP-43 - DagProcessor separation:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-43+DAG+Processor+separation
>> * AIP-44 - Airflow Internal API:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-44+Airflow+Internal+API
>>
>> J.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 4:07 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello Everyone,
>> >
>> > The best time for meeting #3 for multi-tenancy seems to be Wednesday,
>> > Jan 19, 8pm CET. I will prepare a  more detailed agenda Monday
>> > afternoon - please ping me if you would like to present something
>> > during the meeting.
>> >
>> > Event link here:
>> > https://calendar.google.com/event?action=TEMPLATE&tmeid=MDJkamJkaWpnbWozdWJpbmd1Z3JsNWprYTUgcG90aXVrLmFwYWNoZS5vcmdAbQ&tmsrc=potiuk.apache.org%40gmail.com
>> >
>> > Airflow Multi-Tenancy meeting #3
>> > Wednesday, January 19 · 20:00 – 21:00 CET
>> > Google Meet joining info
>> > Video call link: https://meet.google.com/gsq-vvmi-cxq
>> > Or dial: ‪(PL) +48 22 163 87 73‬ PIN: ‪923 532 639‬#
>> > More phone numbers: https://tel.meet/gsq-vvmi-cxq?pin=3847645906103
>> >
>> > I will record the meeting and post both notes and the recording afterwards.
>> >
>> > J.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 12:55 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hello everyone,
>> > >
>> > > Since we are past the holidays I would like to call for a follow-up
>> > > meeting about the multi-tenancy next steps (next week).
>> > >
>> > > I started a Doodle here: please mark your availability. I will pick
>> > > the time by Thursday night and announce it on Friday.
>> > >
>> > > https://doodle.com/poll/s95p29gbhg2gtx4b?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link
>> > >
>> > > We have those two AIP-s which are being discussed:
>> > >
>> > > * AIP-43 - DagProcessor separation:
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-43+DAG+Processor+separation
>> > > * AIP-44 - Airflow Internal API:
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-44+Airflow+Internal+API
>> > >
>> > > As opposed to the first versions of those, there were not many
>> > > comments on the last iteration (which might be both a good and bad
>> > > sign). But I would like (if possible) to reach some conclusions and
>> > > consensus around those two AIPs as the most important part of the
>> > > meeting.  So I encourage everyone who has an interest to comment on
>> > > those two proposals now - in asynchronous fashion, as we will not be
>> > > able to have deep discussion on-line with multiple people.
>> > >
>> > > Both Mateusz and myself are available for discussion also
>> > > #sig-multitenancy at our slack - feel free to discuss related stuff
>> > > there.
>> > >
>> > > I know there are also several other proposals - related to those - so
>> > > please raise them here but I would like to focus on the AIP-43, AIP-44
>> > > - I will reserve time during the meeting that other, follow-up or
>> > > separate proposals can be presented by the authors. Please let me know
>> > > if you would like to present/describe your ideas/proposals (shortly)
>> > > during the meeting.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > J.

Reply via email to