On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 16:23 -0700, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > > I understand and appreciate that you want the standard to be "Show me > the code." But that's not the standard we set.
Not at all. I fully appreciate that just because you can't provide any specific failure mode doesn't mean that no such failure mode exists. But given the amount of time you've expended in arguing your case, it *is* rather telling that you can't actually come up with *anything* concrete at all. Not even a reasonable hypothetical with specifics; only wild handwaving. I picked up on this part of your original response because it seemed like there might *possibly* be something in there that's based in reality, and you've now helped me to conclude that there was not. Other parts, like the wanton digression about URL vs. URI semantics, I glossed over completely since they were so obviously a red herring. -- dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
