On 09/28/2013 12:17 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Sean Leonard <dev+mozi...@seantek.com> wrote:
On 9/27/2013 5:51 PM, Robert Relyea wrote:
I don't have a problem with going for an industry standard way of doing
all of these things, but it's certainly pretty presumptuous to remove these
features without supplying the industry standard replacements and time for
them to filter through the internet. bob
Why isn't <keygen> good enough?
There is no support for key archival with <keygen>, which is supported
by generateCRMFRequest. We heavily rely on generateCRMFRequest in
Dogtag Certificate System (and Red Hat Certificate System), and key
archival is one of the features that we use.
I'm all for a standardized replacement, but it seems wrong to rip out
something that has been a nice functional feature that people have come
to rely on for many years before a replacement is available.
Thanks,
-NGK
Cheers,
Brian
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
