> If you want the signature + document to be legally sustainable and/or > user-interpretable, then plaintext signatures with embedded public keys are > the way to go. You can base64-encode the public keys :) Some further > development of this theme is at > http://iang.org/papers/ricardian_contract.html
Maybe im wrong... Lets suppose i have a page with ISO-8859 encoding. In a textarea -which i want to sign- I type: "Legión Española" and click sign (this will translate ISO into bytes and sign) Then, i send the original+signed data to you. You receive on UTF-8 and try to verify signature. As your UTF string tranlated into bytes its not the same i use, the signature will not be the same-> verification fail. ...am i correct? (Maybe iso/utf-8 share those bytes, but im sure Kim Jong Un use another ones) -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
