Ashok Subash wrote:
> We'll go with your suggestion of using NSS after size reduction for
> this project for our security requirements. But right now we cannot
> upgrade to latest firefox due to the current schedule and resources
> we have for this project. We will follow the guidelines listed in
> the 611781 as well your other suggestions in the mail. It will be
> great if you can support us if we hit a roadblock.

The best way to get such support is to attach ask questions and to post your 
patches in bugs in our bugzilla database. Try to write patches in a way that is 
beneficial to the overall NSS and Gecko (Firefox) projects, so that we can 
incorporate those patches into the mainline Gecko and/or NSS source code. If 
you identify new ways to shrink NSS besides the ways listed in those bugs, then 
please file new bugs and document your findings in them (And please CC me in 
the bug report). It is likely that any such reductions in the size of NSS that 
you make for Firefox 3.6 will be applicable to Firefox 12+ as our usage of NSS 
hasn't changed much between 3.6 and 12. Whenever I get around to working on bug 
611781, the improvements I make will probably benefit your project as well 
(possibly requiring some small modifications.)

- Brian
-- 
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to