On 26.3.11 13:13, Bayard Bell wrote: > I don't see what's so preferable about marginally optimising the > mechanics of this on OS X if it looks to make far more fundamental > changes in the code and the build process that do not fundamentally > jibe with their apparent design philosophy. Why would it be so > preferable to use gcc than lipo in the first place, given that the > former appears to be a more disruptive approach?
Well, patching nsinstall.c etc. to deal with lipo (as suggested in your earlier post) seems like a pretty heavyweight modification to me. See the follow-up I just posted to the "Problems Building NSS on Mac OS X 10.6 (64-bit)" thread for a more suitable solution. Kaspar -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
