On 17.03.2010 02:40, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
Is your proposal or Aza Raskin's proposal similar to the proposal that
Henry Story of the "foaf" project has been advocating?

No, under the assumption you're refering to http://esw.w3.org/Foaf%2Bssl

Contrary to "foaf+ssl" I'm not proposing any new protocols.

My proposal covers user interface enhancements and application behavior, related to the existing SSL client auth and server auth protocols.

(Should "foaf+ssl" require that a user actively manages and selects personal client auth certs when visiting sites, then "foaf+ssl" could even benefit from my proposal, but they would complement one another.)

Kai




-- 
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to