On 07/08/2009 08:35 PM, Paul Hoffman:
At 8:08 PM +0300 7/8/09, Eddy Nigg wrote:
Funny that today it's better to use AES-128.
Why do you say that? It's the opposite of what the people who wrote the paper 
say.

I've not read it today, but IIRC AES-128 remained 2^128 because the attack doesn't work on AES-128?

--
Regards

Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd.
Jabber: start...@startcom.org
Blog:   https://blog.startcom.org

--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to