On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Daniel Stenberg <dan...@haxx.se> wrote: > On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Wan-Teh Chang wrote: > >> But I agree that SIGPIPE is an exception. This is why NSPR (a depenency >> of NSS) calls sigaction() to ignore SIGPIPE during initialization. Note >> that this is done for self protection, rather than as a documented service >> to the NSPR client. > > But doesn't this then contradict what was just said? But why only during > initilization? If it's fine to survive a dead peer during init and not > signal anything, why isn't it later?
This is a problem of my English communication. Let me try again. I didn't mean that SIGPIPE is ignored only during NSPR initialization. I meant that NSPR's initialization function calls sigaction to ignore SIGPIPE. Wan-Teh -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
