> Will be then the multiple OCSP inclusion? (This time ok, the software can

> only check the first, but later the others too.)



Yes, including multiples of these things won't hurt.  Firefox won't

crash or refuse to connect because multiple URIs for these things exist.

It will just ignore some of them.



> The CAIssuer implementation is the same? Getting only the first? Is the

> inclusion of more than one problematic?



I don't know if it will try more than one, but the presence of more than

one will not be a problem.



      For caissuer and ocsp url, then this will be the solution. But my opinion 
is different when talkin CRLDistpoint.





>> This same also implies for CDP.

>

> (I thought on the RFC, which is allows, that you have multiple access

> points for CRL.)



Yes, by different protocols (e.g. by http or by LDAP).  Initially, NSS

will only support fetching by http.



I think it is false:





I have read the RFC again and again, and compare with the AIA, i think the RFC 
has some problem in it.



"If the DistributionPointName contains multiple values, each name describes a 
different mechanism to obtain the same CRL.  For example,

   the same CRL could be available for retrieval through both LDAP and

   HTTP."



for example:

the CRLDistribpoints can have multiple DistributionPoints in it, and the Points 
can have multiple pointnames.

the multiple pointnames should be different from different mechanism. the 
multiple distribpoints can have the same mechanism, no restrictions int he RFC.



If my investigation was correct, openssl makes the sequence of the URIs on the 
Distributionpoint level, and the Generalnames is only a Generalname int he 
Distribpointname field.



I have attached a picture about it, i cant extract better this block.



So my opinion, that you can include multiple http in CDP, if these are grouped 
like this.



Any other opinion?





[cid:image001.png@01C9A8CE.E4C49E70]





--

dev-tech-crypto mailing list

dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org

https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto



_______________________________________________________________________

Ezt az e-mailt virus- es SPAM-szuresnek vetettuk ala a filter:mail MessageLabs 
rendszerrel. Tovabbi informacio: http://www.filtermax.hu



This email has been scanned for viruses and SPAM by the filter:mail MessageLabs 
System. More information: http://www.filtermax.hu 
________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________
Ezt az e-mailt virus- es SPAM-szuresnek vetettuk ala a filter:mail MessageLabs 
rendszerrel. Tovabbi informacio: http://www.filtermax.hu

This email has been scanned for viruses and SPAM by the filter:mail MessageLabs 
System. More information: http://www.filtermax.hu 
________________________________________________________________________________________
-- 
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to