On Feb 24, 10:42 pm, Frank Hecker <hec...@mozillafoundation.org> wrote: > Kathleen Wilson wrote: > > As per the CA Schedule athttps://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:ScheduleComSign > > is the next request in the queue for public discussion. > > Thanks for preparing this for public discussion! > > > * CRL issue: Current CRLs result in the ffffe009 error code when > > downloading into Firefox. ComSign has removed the critical flag from > > the CRL, and the new CRLs will be generated in April. > > Do we know for sure that the problem was due to the CIDP extension? Your > comments in the bug imply that, but I don't see a definitive answer from > Comsign on this point. > > If Comsign is using CIDP, are they doing partitioned CRLs like Hongkong > Post? Or is the CRL a full CRL? > > Frank > > -- > Frank Hecker > hec...@mozillafoundation.org
Hi, I am Stefan from ComSign. Someone from ComSign told Kathleen that we removed the critical flag but obviously this was a misunderstanding since we dont use the CIDP in our Crl`s Here are the CDP`s for the CA crl`s. http://fedir.comsign.co.il/crl/ComSignCA.crl http://fedir.comsign.co.il/crl/ComSignSecuredCA.crl Is CIDP required to use in a crl? Stefan -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
