On 13.02.2009 16:15, Ben Bucksch wrote:
Ian, I also disagree with your change. CPS IMHO must be public,
period. It's important for "Relying parties". The CPS is the only
thing that shows what the CA actually does and warrants to relying
parties.
Even more so must the "recommended practices" be that it's public.
I agree with Eddy's revert, and disagree that you just unilaterally
change the recommended practices to the worse, be it a wiki or not.
Correction: I see that Frank doesn't want to require the CPS be public.
As I said, I disagree.
But even if we don't *require* it, it doesn't mean we shouldn't
*recommend* publishing it.
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
